This is the Postfix program at host caucho.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The Postfix program
<baoogle@xxx.com> (expanded from <hessian-interest-mailout>): host
mx.126.split.netease.com[202.108.5.164] said: 550 User suspended (in reply
to RCPT TO command)
<jasons@xxx.net> (expanded from <hessian-interest-mailout>): host
baracuda.aebn.net[216.54.226.49] said: 550 <jasons@xxx.net>: Recipient
address rejected: No such user (jasons@xxx.net) (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
<xml_resin@xxx.com> (expanded from <hessian-interest-mailout>): host
mx.mail.163.split.netease.com[202.108.5.112] said: 550 Invalid User:
xml_resin@xxx.com (in reply to RCPT TO command)
<Mattias.Arbin@xxx.se> (expanded from <hessian-interest-mailout>): host
mail.carmenta.se[213.115.187.2] said: 550 5.2.1
<Mattias.Arbin@xxx.se>... Mailbox disabled for this recipient (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
<albert@xxx.com.hk> (expanded from <hessian-interest-mailout>): host
mail.gandanet.com.hk[64.14.72.38] said: 511 sorry, no mailbox here by that
name (#5.1.1 - chkuser) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
<yingshou.guo@xxx.com> (expanded from <hessian-interest-mailout>): host
mail.efriendsnet.com[59.151.17.229] said: 511 sorry, no mailbox here by
that name (#5.1.1 - chkuser) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
attached mail follows:
Hi all,
we're currently testing the hessian java libs in combination with the
python client and we have some problems with UTF-8 encoding in Strings.
We took the "latest" version from the caucho webpage "hessianlib.py"
2002/01/17 and we found two reported bugs regarding this version in the
mantis system:
0000116 - http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=116
0000413 - http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=413
Where 413 talks about a patch for the python client.
We haven't found that patch anywhere also we looked for a newer
implementation of the client, but without success.
Any help or ideas on that?
Thanks in advance and best regards
Dominik Helleberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 28 2006 - 20:16:41 PDT